It’s time to stop interviewing this kid.

The kid in question is Brayden “Clavicle” Peters, the blandly handsome face of the recent “Look Max” trend Breaking containment from the red pill circle. Looksmaxxing, for the uninitiated, is the act of breaking bones and dousing yourself with pharmaceutical drugs until you achieve conventional attractiveness. This is an extreme reaction to the unique problems that young men in dating allegedly face, and one that almost guarantees a visceral reaction. Unsurprisingly, then, Clavicular has served as a staple for mainstream experts and publications. His nihilistic ideology and excessive escapism Countless works and interviews— more than enough, actually. You can stop now.

Don’t get me wrong. There are many arguments in favor of interviewing someone like Clavicular.

  • of Dystopian Clip Agriculture Industry Clavicular’s numbers on Kick, his livestreaming platform of choice, may not be astronomical, but I assure you he’s still everywhere.
  • What he preaches to a large young audience — from both perspectives. Sexist, far-right superficiality and A content-centric lifestyle for content At the expense of everything else, it’s natural to be interrogated by people online outside of your terminal.
  • Despite his many unpleasant qualities and actions, Clavicular’s story is a distinctly sad one, with a cynical online subculture turning him into a raw nerve of anxiety. This is also worth asking.
  • For non-traditional reporters I’ve been immersed in livestreaming culture for years.The collarbone, although incredibly distorted, serves as a window into that world.
  • Looksmaxxing has an undeniably corrosive effect on society, but it can also be very funny. For example, mogging, where Looksmax users basically try to outdo each other in terms of looks and other categories, includes: brilliant level Despite Looksmax enthusiasts claiming to be straight, it sits somewhere between professional wrestling and a decades-old queer tradition. (Clavicle has received some backlash from trans women on this issue) multiple opportunity. )

My only two arguments against interviewing Clavicular: 1) He’s 20 years old and stupid as hell. 2) 60 minutes Australia I recently interviewed It covers all the basics listed above and these basics as well, but especially the former. In the end, the enraged Collarbone Man removed his microphone and walked away. this is It’s not the first time he’s done thisbut it felt like a culmination. What more can we learn from this deeply unserious character and the supporting cast’s pretense of taking themselves seriously? You can move on.

60 Minutes Australia reporter Adam Hegarty did the smartest thing by not even pretending to think there was any merit to the philosophy born in Clavicular’s forum. He didn’t mock or ridicule his topics, but when he sensed a whiff of bullshit, he would weave it into his questions – as any good interviewer should do, but too few do.

For example, consider the following interaction:

Hegarty: Why do you think it is so unusually popular among young men?

Clavicle: Because LookMax is the key thing that’s been missing in the manosphere and in many male internet spaces. And that’s kind of the answer, right? Many disparities can be overcome by becoming rich, famous, or achieving some kind of success. But if you’re not physically attractive, you’re not going to have long-lasting relationships with women, you’re not going to get as much respect from the people around you, and you’re suddenly going to be treated differently because of something called the “halo effect,” right? And if you’re not genetically wealthy, it’s scary to have to live with that for the rest of your life.

Hegarty: Look, I disagree and insist, Krav, that character, personality, maturity; [and] Intelligence is much more important than appearance. do you think i’m wrong?

Clavicle: Well, bingo, it is, but these are all, again, perceived completely differently based on how they look. Therefore you are completely right. You’re just forgetting that important nuance, and that’s kind of why my message resonates so much.

Hegarty: Do you think that sends the wrong message to vulnerable, insecure men?

Clavicle: If you’re not genetically good-looking, I think it’s hard to hear at first that the world revolves around looking good. Because now they have to overcome this seemingly impossible obstacle in their life, and in some cases they have to take all kinds of medicines and undergo plastic surgery. But it’s true, and there’s a lot of data to support it. So how people react to this kind of cruel reality is up to them. But yes, you are certainly right. It can send people into a spiral and cause things like severe body dysmorphia. But it’s just a reality drug that needs to come out.

Hegarty: But look, I don’t think so, Krav. I don’t think looks are as important as you say.

Clavicle: Hmm. If you were bald or fat, do you think you would have done this interview or become a journalist?

Hegarty: Yeah. Yes, that’s right.

Now, it’s worth noting that Hegarty is charming, which is part of what makes this interview work so well. Here, a cool, confident, good-looking slightly older man lectures an insecure younger example about what it means to be handsome, perhaps, but the dire messages he absorbed as a teenager crumble in the face of real life experience. And Hegarty would know: He’s lived it, but his collarbone relatively hasn’t. (Also, Mr. Collarbone clearly doesn’t know many journalists, otherwise he would have realized that many of them are actually bald.)

As many online have observed, Hegarty is practically mauling his collarbone, beating him not only at his own game, but some of the more important ones as well. In this way, they spread harmful ideologies designed to lure in angry, confused, or fearful people. Sure, you present the facts, but at the same time, show They are alternatives.

The rest of the interview moves along more or less quickly until the collarbone finally breaks out. Hegarty doesn’t ask Clavicular particularly difficult questions. Because while Clavicular talks about the complex statistics and stacks that underpin his worldview, he doesn’t really do that much. remains fundamentally immature. Namely, Collarbone left before the titular 60 minutes were up because he sensed a faint smell. politics.

“You were seen with certain people from all parts of the area. [incel-adjacent] Hegarty said it was “literally the worst series of questions” he had ever heard after Clavicular asked questions about his connection to incel culture. Why spend time with such people? ”

“I know you want to make this political,” Clavicular replies.

The two then talked for a while, and Hegarty clarified: “I’m not interested in your politics. I know you’re not political. You’ve said that many times. Obviously people make assumptions when you’re around people like that. I’m wondering what your thought process and motivations are behind you.” [spending time with them]. ”

Seems like a fair question! So, naturally, Clavicular resorts to vague threats.

“I guess you were looking at Piers.” [Morgan] “Unfortunately, potentially, we didn’t have time to look into anything.” Who did your wife cheat on with?. But please don’t try to ask me such questions. I’m not doing anything political. [questions]”

“I’m not married, Krav,” Hegarty replies.

At that point, there’s only one tool left in Clavicle’s arsenal. It is the basis of the whole hatched personality egg, which is huge for him, but very small for others.

“Maybe I need to max out my looks then,” he murmurs. “Maybe I could change that if I showed you how to do looksmaxx. But thank you for your time. I appreciate the interview.”

We’re Never Twelve More – Aftermath

In the same week, government agencies adopted Halo, and now JD Vance is also turning heads with CollarGate


#time #stop #interviewing #kid

Leave a Comment